Cates v. Division of Gambling and Control
Court conclude that the trial court erred in denying Cates and Ellis leave to amend to add a section 1102.5 cause of action and summarily adjudicating the discrimination and failure to prevent discrimination causes of action asserted by Cates, Ellis and Heintz and the retaliation and aiding and abetting retaliation claims by Cates. Accordingly, court reverse the judgments as to those rulings. In all other respects, court affirm the judgments because the Plaintiffs waived their challenge to the trial court's partial denial of their discovery motion by failing to produce an adequate record to permit appellate review and the Defendants have established their entitlement to summary adjudication of Broach's discrimination and failure to prevent discrimination claims and Ellis's retaliation and aiding and abetting retaliation claims.
Comments on Cates v. Division of Gambling and Control