Johl v. Sri GuruNanakSikhTemple
This case involves a dispute over whether the plaintiffs retained their status as directors and whether defendants were properly elected as directors of the Sri Guru Nanak Sikh Temple (the Temple) under its articles of incorporation and bylaws. Plaintiffs allege they are the duly existing directors of the Temple and the individual defendants are persons who claim to be directors of [the] temple pursuant to an appointment allegedly made on June 5, 2005.
Plaintiffs successfully challenged the validity of the individual defendants appointment by a complaint filed pursuant to Corporations Code section 9418. On appeal, defendants argue the trial court erred in interpreting the bylaws. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Johl v. Sri GuruNanakSikhTemple