Poredos v. Park West Family Partnership
Plaintiff appeals following an order of dismissal for failure to diligently prosecute his case against defendant Park West Family Partnership (and related defendants, collectively referred to as Park West). Contrary to Poredoss contentions, the record read in its proper context does not establish that the trial court thought it had no choice but to grant the motion for terminating sanctions, and the court did not abuse its broad discretion in dismissing the action rather than imposing some lesser sanction. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Poredos v. Park West Family Partnership