Cryoport Systems v. CNA Insurance Companies
Cryoport Systems (Cryoport) sued CNA Insurance Companies, Continental Casualty Company, and Valley Forge Insurance Company (hereafter collectively and in the singular CNA), for violation of the unfair competition law (UCL). (Bus. & Prof. Code, 17200 et seq.) CNAs demurrer to the original complaint was sustained, with leave to amend, because Cryoport failed to allege standing (i.e., that it suffered injury in fact and lost money or property) as required by Proposition 64s amendments to the UCL. ( 17204, as amended by Prop. 64, 3; see also 17203, as amended by Prop. 64, 2.) In its amended complaint, Cryoport again failed to allege its own standing and CNAs demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. On appeal from the judgment dismissing its complaint, Cryoport argues reversal is required so it may attempt to amend its complaint to substitute in a new plaintiff who in fact has standing to pursue the action. Court disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Cryoport Systems v. CNA Insurance Companies