legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Baby Jane Doe
By appeal and by petition for writ of habeas corpus, Kenneth W. (appellant) challenges the juvenile courts order terminating parental rights as to Baby Jane Doe (the child). In his appeal, appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile courts finding that the child was a safely surrendered baby under Health and Safety Code section 1255.7, and that the court failed to advise him of his right to seek writ review of its order setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing. In the appeal and the habeas corpus petition, appellant contends that the court should not have proceeded with a section 366.26 hearing in his absence, after he called the court to inform it that he was having car trouble. Appellant makes various other claims in the habeas corpus petition. Court affirm the juvenile courts termination order and deny appellants petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale