P. v. Thigpenn
Defendant was convicted of attempted carjacking and making criminal threats. It was found true that he had served a term of imprisonment within the meaning of Penal Code sections 667.5, subdivision (b), and 668, that he had a serious felony prior within the meaning of sections 667, subdivision (a)(1), 668, 1192.7, subdivision (c), and that he had a strike prior within the meaning of sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i), 668 and 1170.12. Thigpenn was sentenced to 10 years in prison. He appeals, contending the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to dismiss his 1999 robbery strike prior, and the court abused its discretion by failing to consider a mitigating factor. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Thigpenn