SINAIKO HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, INC. v. PACIFIC HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS PART II
The mere service of an untimely interrogatory response, which may or may not reflect a good faith effort to comply with the party's discovery obligations, does not divest the trial court of authority to hear and grant a motion to compel responses under Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 2030.290(b).
Comments on SINAIKO HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, INC. v. PACIFIC HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS PART II