In re J.D.
Defendant (father) appeals from the juvenile courts order suspending its previous order of visitation in a therapeutic setting with his sons, J.D. and B.D. (the children). He claims that the court erred in suspending his visitation because the Department of Childrens Services (DCS) never complied with the courts previous visitation order, and because DCS failed to file a Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition to request a modification of the previous order. Father further contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the courts finding that visitation was detrimental to the children. Court affirm.
Comments on In re J.D.