Song v. Kim
Plaintiff and respondent Hee Ok Song (Mrs. Song) sued defendant Kevin H. Song (Mr. Song) and defendant and appellant Dr. Tay Seun Kim (Dr. Kim) for conversion and conspiracy to commit conversion. Mrs. Song alleged that Dr. Kim conspired with her former husband, Mr. Song, to convert money from a business in which Mrs. Song had invested and owned with Mr. Song in exchange for a 51 percent share of the profits. Mrs. Song alleged that Dr. Kim helped Mr. Song transfer money from the business account to Mr. Song for his personal use, and that she never received her share of profits from the business. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Mrs. Song for $450,000 against Dr. Kim and Mr. Song jointly and severally. Dr. Kim appeals from this judgment. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the judgment. Court further find that Dr. Kim has not shown that an earlier judgment in Mr. and Mrs. Songs marital dissolution collaterally estops this judgment against him. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Song v. Kim