legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Conservatorship of Auhkbar
This case stems from a petition filed by the San Mateo County Public Guardian (San Mateo County) in which it sought to compel the appointment of the Alameda County Public Guardian (Alameda County) as the conservator of the person and estate of Raeven Auhkbar. Concluding that San Mateo County had not carried its burden of proving that Mr. Auhkbar was domiciled in Alameda County, the trial court dismissed the petition. On appeal, San Mateo County contends that in doing so, the trial court failed to apply the proper legal standard and abused its discretion in relying on Mr. Auhkbars testimony, which it deems not credible because it was confused, unintelligible and non-responsive.
Court conclude that the trial courts determination concerning Mr. Auhkbars place of domicile was supported by substantial evidence, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the petition. Accordingly, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale