In re SHEENA K., Part I
Objection to probation condition on ground that it is vague or overbroad and thus facially unconstitutional, is not forfeited by failure to object at the time the condition is imposed. Probation condition requiring that defendant not associate with anyone "disapproved of" by "probation" was unconstitutionally vague or overbroad but may be modified to require that probationer not associate with persons known to the probationer to be disapproved of by probation officer.
Comments on In re SHEENA K., Part I