legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Krause v. Loeb & Loeb
Appellants were sued, along with several other defendants, by plaintiffs Bernelle Krause and the Kalman Krause Family Limited Partnership. Appellants moved to compel arbitration pursuant to a contractual arbitration agreement to which they and plaintiffs are parties, but to which the remaining defendants are not. The trial court denied the petition, concluding that under Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2, subdivision (c), the litigation arises out of a series of related transactions and there is a possibility of conflicting rulings on issues held in common by appellants, who would be subject to the arbitration, and the remaining defendants, who would not. Court find no abuse of discretion, and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale