legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Halley M.
In case number A111370, Court affirmed a juvenile court order denying additional visits and suspending telephone calls between appellant Joyce M. and her dependent daughter, Halley M. Now, appellant appeals from a subsequent order she describes as slightly different from the previous order. She makes the same arguments she made in the earlier appeal and relies primarily on evidence predating the courts previous order, which we affirmed upon concluding the juvenile court acted within its discretion. Court once again conclude there was no abuse of discretion and affirm the juvenile courts order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale