P. v. Bergeron
Defendant appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of numerous offenses arising out of a crime spree committed from March 2004 to June 2004. Bergeron argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel, there was instructional error, insufficient evidence supported two of his convictions and one of his prior convictions, and there were sentencing errors. Court agree there was insufficient evidence to support the finding on his prior conviction. Court affirm the convictions and remand for further proceedings.
Comments on P. v. Bergeron