legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ball
On December 16, 2004, appellant, entered into a plea bargain in case Nos. F04901731 - 0 and F04901836-7. In case No. F04901731- 0, Ball pled no contest to assault with a firearm (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(2)) and admitted a gang enhancement ( 186.22, subd. (a)(2)), a personal gun use enhancement ( 12022.5, subd. (a)(1)), and allegations that he had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law ( 667, subd. (b)-(i)). In case No. F04901836 - 7, Ball pled no contest to arson of an inhabited building ( 451, subd. (b)). The agreement also provided that Ball would receive a prison term of 17 to 19 years.
On appeal, Ball contends: 1) his sentence must be reduced or he must be permitted to withdraw his plea because his sentence contains three unauthorized components; and 2) the court erred by not giving him actual custody credit for his custody time from the date of his original sentencing to the date of his resentencing. Court find merit to his second contention and that his first contention is not cognizable on appeal. In all other respects, Court affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale