legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mendez
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of child endangerment (Pen. Code, 273a, subd. (a)). In return, the remaining two counts of child endangerment were dismissed, and defendant was placed on probation on various terms and conditions. On appeal, defendant contends (1) the probation condition requiring her to keep the probation officer informed of whether she owns any pets is invalid; and (2) the probation condition requiring her to submit to and cooperate in field interrogations is overly broad and infringes upon her constitutional rights. Court reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale