County of Sacramento v. Guidera
Mother contends on appeal the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion because (1) the court failed to consider all of the factors applicable to determinations of the best interest of the child in move away cases, as set forth in the Supreme Courts decision in In re Marriage of LaMusga (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1072 (LaMusga) and (2) there is no reasonable basis for the courts conclusion that transferring custody to father is in the childs best interests. Moreover, mother complains, the court improperly made a conditional order with the intent of coercing her to abandon plans to relocate in order to live with her new husband, who is in the Navy stationed in Hawaii. Because Court agree the record fails to show the trial court properly applied the principles set forth in LaMusga, supra, 32 Cal.4th 1072, Court reverse the order and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Comments on County of Sacramento v. Guidera