Wingate v. Rhinotek Licensing
Plaintiff sued her former employer Gerald Chamales Corporation, formerly doing business as Rhinotek Licensing, LLP (Rhinotek), claiming that she suffered discrimination and sexual harassment by her supervisor, Scott Stanfield. Following a jury trial, she was awarded $15,000 in damages and $22,836.29 in attorney fees and costs. She appeals, contending that the trial court erred by denying her motion to limit evidence of other sexual conduct, granting Rhinoteks motion for nonsuit on the punitive damages claim, and failing to award appropriate attorney fees and costs. Rhinotek filed a cross appeal, contending that the verdict cannot be upheld as a matter of law. It also contends that the appeal should be dismissed for plaintiffs failure to include in her brief citations to the record as required by California Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(C). Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Wingate v. Rhinotek Licensing