legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gutierrez
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of robbery with a further finding that he personally and intentionally discharged a firearm (Pen. Code, 211, 12022.53, subd. (c), count 2) and shooting at an occupied motor vehicle (id., 246, count 3). (Further section references are to the Pen. Code.) The jury acquitted defendant on a charge of attempted murder ( 664/187, count 1). Defendant was sentenced to the middle term of three years on count 2, with an enhancement of 20 years for firearm use. Sentence on count 3 was stayed under section 654.
Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the robbery conviction and that the trial court prejudicially erred in (2) instructing on count 2, (3) failing to instruct on a lesser included offense of count 3, and (4) responding to a jury question on count 3. Court find merit in defendants third contention and reverse count 3 on that basis, rendering it unnecessary to address defendants fourth contention. In all other respects, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale