legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.G.
Plaintiff and appellant (hereafter mother), appeals from the trial courts order summarily denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition. Mother filed the petition in April 2006 in order to obtain a modification of the trial courts order establishing legal guardianship as the permanent plan for her young sons, C.G. and B.G., in a section 300 proceeding that San Bernardino County Department of Childrens Services (DCS) initiated in June 2003 after mother was in a car accident in which both boys were injured.[2]More particularly, mother had then 18-month-old C.G. and four-year-old B.G. in the car with her when she had a head-on collision while driving under the influence of cocaine and various prescription medications. Both of the boys were injured in the collision B.G.s injuries included a cut on his lower lip that required four stitches and C.G.s injuries included a contusion on his forehead. Court disagree with mothers claim, for reasons Court now explain, and therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale