legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Sophia P.
Appellant purports to appeal from the order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) as to his daughter, Sophia P. (born August 2004). However, he seeks to reverse the juvenile courts orders in this matter dating back to [the] jurisdiction and disposition orders. Appellant (a drug addict with no known address at the time of the childs birth) contends that DCFS made inadequate attempts at notice and due diligence to locate him, and that his trial attorneys assistance was ineffective when, prior to the setting of the section 366.26 hearing, counsel failed to seek to vacate previous orders for lack of notice. Appellant raises no contention directly challenging matters occurring at the section 366.26 hearing terminating parental rights. Accordingly, since the appeal raises issues beyond the permissible scope of appellate review, Court have no authority to review those matters. The appeal must be dismissed. The appeal is dismissed.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale