legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Elaina H.
Jose C. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to his daughter Elaina H. He contends his federal due process rights were violated over the course of Elainas dependency so as to require reversal of the termination order. On review, we conclude that because the superior court never made any unfitness findings related to appellant, it could not terminate his parental rights. Accordingly, Court reverse the termination order with directions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale