In re Jim M.
Sheng Y. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her two-year-old son, Jim M. At the section 366.26 hearing, she as well as the childs father unsuccessfully asked the court to find that termination would be detrimental to Jim. Each parent claimed to have a beneficial parent/child relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) with Jim. Appellant contends the courts rejection of her claim was erroneous on a variety of grounds, none of which Court find persuasive. On review, Court conclude the court did not abuse its discretion and affirm.
Comments on In re Jim M.