In re Jim M.
Mai M. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to his two-year-old son, Jim M. At the section 366.26 hearing, he as well as the childs mother unsuccessfully asked the court to find that termination would be detrimental to Jim. Each parent claimed to have a beneficial parent/child relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) with Jim. Appellant contends the court erred because he produced sufficient evidence to warrant a detriment finding. He also joins in other arguments raised in the mothers appeal (In re Jim M.; F051126) and related to the courts rejection of their section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) claims. On review, Court conclude the court did not abuse its discretion and affirm.
Comments on In re Jim M.