Reeves v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
Appellant filed a complaint against respondent Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., alleging it had failed to hire him for an attorney position because of his age. Kaiser moved for summary judgment arguing it was entitled to prevail as a matter of law because appellants age did not play any part in the decision not to hire him. Rather, the person in charge of the decision had offered the job to another attorney before she even became aware that appellant had applied. The trial court agreed with Kaiser and granted the motion. Appellant now appeals contending triable issues of fact were presented. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on Reeves v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan