Martinez v. Estrada
Irene Martinez appeals from a judgment denying her petition for an injunction against Aurelia Hortensia Estrada, who had worked for Martinez at a nonprofit organization, prohibiting harassment under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6.[1] Martinez contends: (1) the trial court improperly expanded the scope of the injunction hearing by admitting irrelevant evidence concerning her personal relationship with Estrada; and (2) the court made improper findings that she coerced Estrada into a having a personal relationship with her and that she had an improper motive in filing her petition for injunction, namely to dissuade Estrada from suing her. Court find no merit to her contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Martinez v. Estrada