In re X.C.
Appellant Rodney R. appeals from the juvenile courts rulings on a supplemental petition brought pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 387[1] by the San Francisco Department of Human Services (Department). Rodney R. contends reversal is necessary because of the courts failure to consider placing the subject minor, X.C., with him, a noncustodial parent, pursuant to section 361.2, subdivision (a) before removing X.C. from his mothers physical custody and placing him in foster care. Court affirm.
Comments on In re X.C.