In re Selena C.
Lisa B. (mother) appeals from an order denying her petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and an order terminating dependency jurisdiction over her two younger children, David O. and William O. She contends reversal is required due the failure of the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to comply fully with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA, 25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.). She also contends the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition and in terminating jurisdiction over David and William. Court conditionally vacate the orders from which mother appeals and remand the case for compliance with ICWA.
Comments on In re Selena C.