P. v. Horsman
A jury found appellant Aaron Matthew Horsman guilty of receiving stolen property. (See Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a).) He was granted probation and required to serve 120 days in county jail as a condition of probation. Horsman appeals the judgment, contending that prejudicial error occurred because the court failed to instruct the jury on the corpus delicti rule. (See CALJIC No. 2.72.) The Attorney General concedes that the court should have given this instruction but contends that the error was harmless. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Horsman