P. v. Levell
A jury convicted defendant Andre Kevin Levell of possession of methamphetamine for sale and possession of drug paraphernalia. On appeal, defendant contends that (1) the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request for a continuance made at the trials end, (2) the prosecutor engaged in misconduct during argument by commenting on his failure to testify (Griffin v. California (1965) 380 U.S. 609 (Griffin)), and (3) the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Court disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Levell