P. v. Sotello
Appellant, pled no contest in case No. 05CM4504 to vehicle theft (Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a)) and admitted allegations that he had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (Pen. Code, 667, subds.(b)-(i)). In case No. 05CM4598, Sotello pled no contest to possession of stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a)) and admitted allegations that he had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law. On appeal, Sotello contends the court: 1) violated the terms of his plea bargain; 2) erred in denying him counsel and a hearing with respect to his motion to withdraw his plea; and 3) committed Blakely error. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sotello