In re A.M.
Appellant, mother of the minors, appeals from the juvenile courts orders denying her reunification services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 360, 361.5, subd. (b), 395; further undesignated statutory references are to this code.) Appellant claims reversal is mandated because it was not shown that the experts whose evaluations were the basis for denying services had the requisite qualifications. She also argues there was insufficient evidence that her mental disability was the cause of her inability to benefit from services. Court affirm.
Comments on In re A.M.