P. v. Perry
In each of these three superior court cases, defendant Jack Lee Perry, Jr., admitted violating probation. Thereafter, the court revoked probation, and imposed sentence in all three cases in a single proceeding. On appeal, defendant urges us to correct errors in the abstract of judgment because it (1) incorrectly identifies one of the offenses of which he was convicted and (2) incorrectly indicates that the sentences he received in two cases represent the low, rather than the middle, term for each offense. His claims of error have merit: Court order the abstract amended.
Comments on P. v. Perry